147, -0.204, -0.180, -0.212, -0.180, -0.178, -0.153, and -0.159, respectively, in Group C (P = .569); MAE was 0.346, 0.375, 0.382, 0.379, 0.355, 0.377, 0.318, and 0.364, respectively, in Group A (P = .286); 0.402, 0.422, 0.417, 0.427, 0.417, 0.402, 0.370, and 0.401, respectively, in Group B (P = .364); and 0.401, 0.424, 0.419, 0.444, 0.424, 0.404, 0.391, and 0.422, respectively, in Group C (P = .767). https://www.selleckchem.com/products/d609.html Effect of constant optimization in phacovitrectomy was statistically significant for all formulas (P less then .001 for each formula). CONCLUSIONS No statistically significant difference was observed between the biometric formulas with regard to PE and MAE. However, in terms of phacovitrectomy, constant optimization should be considered for individual intraocular lens power calculations attributable to myopic shift.PURPOSE To evaluate the level of agreement of partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster) and an image-guided system (Verion) in terms of keratometric values and intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation. SETTING Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Greece. DESIGN Prospective comparative study. METHODS Keratometric (K) values and IOL power calculations were compared for 3 toric IOL models (SN6ATx, TFNTx0, and SV25Tx) using 4 formulas (SRK/T, Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) in patients who had cataract surgery in a consecutive-if-eligible way. RESULTS Ninety-eight eyes from 54 patients were included in the study (mean age 60.2 ± 9.2 years). Compared with the IOLMaster, the Verion measured significantly steeper K1, K2, and Km values (P .05). With the SRK/T formula, the SN6ATx IOL showed significant difference in the mean IOL power calculated by the 2 devices, whereas no significant difference was observed in the TFNTx0 IOL and the SV25Tx IOL. However, with the Holladay 1, Hoffer Q, and Haigis formulas, a significant difference was found in the mean IOL power of all 3 toric IOL models. Generally, the Verion calculated a significantly lower mean IOL power for almost all formulas and IOL models. For 35 toric implantations, the mean residual astigmatism power, 6 months postoperatively, was 0.29 ± 0.24 diopter. CONCLUSIONS The IOLMaster and the Verion seemed to present differences in IOL calculation and surgical planning that could lead to unexpected residual refractive error. When discrepancy is detected in IOL calculation, using the IOLMaster as the primary biometry and the Verion as a digital marker alone could provide excellent outcomes in terms of astigmatism correction.PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical outcomes obtained after cataract or crystalline lens surgery with implantation of a new continuous transitional focus intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING San Rafael Hospital, Madrid, Spain. DESIGN Nonrandomized prospective case series. METHODS Uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery was performed with bilateral implantation of the continuous transitional focus IOL Precizon Presbyopic. Visual, refractive, and contrast sensitivity outcomes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. Likewise, the incidence of postoperative disturbing photic phenomena was recorded. RESULTS Sixty-two eyes of 31 patients (mean age 61.3 years) were enrolled. Mean 6-month postoperative binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near visual acuity (UNVA) were 0.01 ± 0.03, 0.17 ± 0.04, and 0.02 ± 0.04 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. A total of 98.4% (61) and 93.5% (58) of eyes achieved 20/25 monocular UDVA and UNVA or better, respectively, whereas all eyes (100%) achieved 20/30 UIVA or better. Mean corrected visual acuity of 0.14 ± 0.05, 0.15 ± 0.06, and 0.19 ± 0.02 logMAR were obtained for the defocus levels of -1.00, -1.50, and -2.00 diopters. Mean 6-month postoperative log contrast sensitivity was 1.22 ± 0.18 and 0.75 ± 0.10 for 12 and 18 cycles per degree, respectively. A total of 9.7% (3) and 6.5% (2) of patients reported disturbing halos and glare. CONCLUSIONS This presbyopia-correcting IOL provided a complete visual rehabilitation after cataract surgery, maintaining excellent levels of visual quality. Specifically, the IOL generated a continuous range of functional vision from distance to near, with minimal levels of photic phenomena associated.PURPOSE To determine the incidence of intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification cataract surgery in a teaching hospital and to compare the intraoperative complication rate between resident trainees and staff ophthalmologists, to ascertain the overall rate of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation on postoperative day 1 (POD1), and, again, to compare this value between resident trainees and staff surgeons. SETTING Centro Hospitalar São João, Oporto, Portugal. DESIGN Retrospective study. METHODS This study included eyes submitted for phacoemulsification cataract surgery from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. There were no exclusion criteria. Data collected included the type of surgeon, level of resident training, case complexity, and intraoperative complications. From all noncomplicated surgeries, preoperative IOP and IOP-POD1 were collected. RESULTS A total of 2937 surgeries were included; 25.6% were performed by resident trainees. The complication rate was 6.3% with resident trainees and statistically significantly lower (3.3%) in staff surgeons. The complication rate of resident trainees did not differ according to their level of residency. There was a significantly increased incidence of IOP-POD1 elevation in the resident trainee group compared with the staff surgeon group. Surgeries performed by resident trainees, a preexisting history of glaucoma, and pseudoexfoliation were significant risk factors for IOP elevation. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first European study comparing the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in cataract surgery performed by resident trainees and staff surgeons. We report a significantly higher rate of intraoperative complications and IOP elevation on POD1 in resident trainees vs staff surgeons.PURPOSE To determine whether impaired or absent stereopsis affects the ability to perform simulated microsurgical tasks. SETTING University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom. DESIGN Prospective randomized cross-over study. METHODS Visual acuity and stereoacuity were measured. A band-pass filter was placed over the nondominant eye to reduce stereoacuity to 150 seconds of an arc (partial stereopsis), or the nondominant eye was completely occluded (absent stereopsis). Participants completed a computerized surgical simulator task 3 times with a randomized testing order (normal stereopsis, absent stereopsis, and partial stereopsis). The task involved using forceps to grasp and position objects in the anterior chamber. Outcomes included area of ocular injury, time to task completion, and overall score. RESULTS Ocular damage area was significantly worse with partial stereopsis (P = .002) and worse still when stereopsis was absent (P less then .001 for normal vs absent stereopsis and P = .005 for partial vs absent stereopsis).